As a kid I imagined the future as being able to hold a TV in your pocket, and flying skateboards. For the latter I guess electric scooters will have to do

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        6 months ago

        Absolutely! (Same as playing a regular game on a Game Gear.)

        I had both an AC adapter and a 12VDC car adapter for mine. Without those (considering the sorry state of rechargeables back then), the cost of batteries would’ve made actually using the damn thing untenable.

        • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 months ago

          Look, I tried, and failed, to come up with a joke involving bonking something on the head, but they all got too wordy.

          That thing was heavy as hell, especially with all those batteries.

      • TheAgeOfSuperboredom@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Probably! According to Wikipedia you get 3-5 hours off of 6 AA batteries. Not sure how that changes with the TV tuner but battery life wasn’t great.

        • deweydecibel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 months ago

          The antenna doesn’t need power to receive the signal, unless it’s boosted, but something tells me that’s not the case here.

          What might consume more power would be any kind of decoding that’s going on.

    • spookex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      The PSP also had that type of attachment here in Japan, but it uses the 1-seg standard that IIRC was made for phones and still exists

  • Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    As most of the other comments point out, pocket TV did exist and you have exposed yourself as:

    1. Younger than the smartphone
    2. Never watched a 90’s movie with a security guard in it
    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      30
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Both wrong

      1. 1st smartphone Galaxy Spica age 26

      2. These TV wouldn’t fit in your jeans

      You missed the point of my very unelaborate shower thought. I see how not being a thing could be understood as never existed. I meant a big thing like, you know, smartphones

  • Krafty Kactus@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    I mean they literally are, you can watch literally any tv show or movie on them so I don’t see a difference.

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I disagree, the watchman and clones existed into the 2000s and were tech found in several households. Ours ended up with some of the tornado kit so we could get news broadcasts in power outages and other emergencies.

        Gimmick/niche isn’t an appropriate description for technology that was superceded by smartphones, even early ones.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      6 months ago

      And actual pocket TVs. Interesting to see OP think they were never a thing. Don’t get me wrong, they were shit, but they did exist!

    • bitchkat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      I used one as recent as the mid 2000’s. There was some sporting event going on (probably women’s world cup) and I wanted to watch the game while playing in Ultimate league. Streaming wasn’t as prevalent as it is now and the game was on OTA channel.

  • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 months ago

    There absolutely were pocket TV’s. As a kid, even, I owned two of them. They are now of course functionally useless because they predate the switch to digital television by a significant margin. Both of mine were Realistic brand ones, which was an in store label for Radio Shack. Color LCD displays, telescoping antenna, and they ran off of 4 AA batteries. They were about the size of an OG Gameboy or a large Walkman.

    I might even still have one in a box of tech junk somewhere. I believe the second one was a Realistic Pocketvision 27.

    You can still buy a portable digital TV. These were always a bit of a stretch for a “pocket” television, more the size of a small tablet but thicker. But they totally did, and still do, exist.

  • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    What are you even on about? I have a screen in my pocket where i can watch quite literally every movie that exists.
    Imagine being a time traveller and someone asks you if you have any cool tech like a pocket tv.
    “Hah, no kiddo, we dont. I have that screnn with access to movies and tv shows tho.”

  • Boozilla@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 months ago

    I think some of the folks in this thread might enjoy the Techmoan channel on YouTube. It’s not about pocket TVs in particular, but he does review and restore old AV tech. It’s a fun channel if you’re into retro tech.

    • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      If we’re gonna rep tech YouTubers, I am honor bound to mention Technology Connections.

      Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to buy 2 of something.

      • Boozilla@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Love Technology Connections. I learned way too much about pinball machines thanks to thay guy.

    • NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      No, because your smartphone needs internet, tv signals reach way more places, and more reliably.

      Especially since broadcast tv, in America ya damn Limeys, is free, while internet is either very localized (WiFi, etc…) which may or may not be free, or wide spread (Cell phones, Satellites, etc…) which are definitely pay.

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      I know it’s semantics, but if your great-gramps would time travel to today, he would ask about your pocket TV, and you would reply nah, it’s a smartphone

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Which is actually not smartphone, but a general purpose computer with cell internet connection that can be used for many things, one of those is actually calling.

    • BeatTakeshi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      How do you call yours though?

      A smartphone is ALSO a pocket TV is what you mean. It’s not the other way round is what I mean.

      “The iTV 6 Pro can now make phone calls”

  • UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I had one that had the same form factor as a gameboy. It was black, the screen had a resolution so tiny you could not really make anything out, and it was almost impossible to get a stable signal. But I loved it when I was 12 years old, because I was only allowed to watch tv for an hour every day, and nobody knew I had that tiny TV which I bought from the money I made delivering flowers. I still have it in a box somewhere.

    Edit: this