• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Biden is the one supporting slaughter right now, and Biden is the one with power to stop it.

      What would protesting Trump do?

      • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Honestly? It would keep him hopefully from having a close enough election to contest it, game it, and potentially evade punishment for the crimes he’s actually on trial RIGHT NOW for committing. Then there is precedent for punishing a president and guess who can be next?

        Biden does not sit on a button that says “lower gas prices” or “defund Israel” or “hold trump accountable” or any of a whole variety of things in the first place. Can he do more? Sure. Would I trash him because everybody has to do the exact right thing with the exact right issue every time or I’m going to take my ball and go home to let the other guy win and escape punishment for the first time ever? Fuck. No.

        Get precedent for punishment, then punish them all.

        • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          The US by its own law must not send weapons to war criminals and actors preventing US humanitarian efforts Israel is doing both. All Biden has to do is uphold US law. Why are you letting him get away with the same shit that Trump did?

          • dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            See last sentence of previous comment.

            Nobody has to get away with anything, the only trick is not chasing every squirrel in the park to make sure nothing gets done.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 months ago

          Read my comment very carefully. Where did I say “Trump would do less harm?” Exactly nowhere.

          Protesting Trump for what he will probably do if he makes it to office rather than the sitting president actively supporting genocide is hilariously ineffective.

          You should try knowing what you’re talking about some time

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              No it isn’t, lmao. Who the fuck protests someone who can’t fix the problem at hand? Do you want to protest against Hitler for also being worse than Biden as Biden assists in slaughtering children?

              “Kiddo,” you’re deeply unserious.

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        8 months ago

        Ensure he doesn’t get into office and push Israel harder to annihilate every Gazan.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          8 months ago

          Israel is already absolutely blasting every man, woman, and child in Gaza, with no sign of stopping. Could Trump be worse? Sure. Is giving Biden a pass and falling in line with his genocide going to make things better? Absolutely the fuck not.

          • nexguy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            24
            ·
            8 months ago

            I didn’t say anything about Biden, only that Trump getting into office would make make Israel feel emboldened to kill more children with Trump openly applauding and perhaps even supporting with American troops on the ground. Biden needs to change his view but we are protesting while standing on the lip of a maga volcano.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              8 months ago

              Biden is openly appluading it and sending American weapons. If you think Trump is bad, I agree! Biden needs to be worth voting for.

                  • nexguy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I think Trump is the much much bigger threat. He supports the genocide in both Ukraine and Israel. At least Biden is vocally against the genocide in Israel. We just need to get Biden into office then work on getting aid to Gaza and a cease-fire along with continued support for Ukraine. Trump in office could mean the end of NATO and with that the proliferation of nuclear weapons among all the other NATO members now that their nuclear umbrella is gone. Everywhere could be like Gaza of Trump is allowed anywhere near the oval office. He is a risk not worth taking under any circumstances.

      • Classy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        21
        ·
        8 months ago

        I’m so glad Trump is running because it means Biden can do literally anything and every single voter can just scream BUT TRUMP TOO and suddenly Joe is absolved.

        • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          arrow-down
          19
          ·
          8 months ago

          That’s completely unrelated. Biden is the current president, and he must answer for his decisions.

          If Biden is concerned he’ll loose to Trump over this, THEN STOP FEEDING THE GENOCIDE. It’s that simple.

            • TheFriar@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              24
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              You are entirely missing the point here. You seem so deluded by factionalism that you can’t see this as anything but a democrat vs Republican issue.

              This is a HUMAN GODDAMN LIVES issue. A literal genocide is happening and you’re playing the whataboutism game. “Whataboutism” is used way too much as a phrase in discussions, but this is a textbook example of it.

              “Biden is contributing to genocide.”

              “But trump is a criminal.”

              “Okay…but people are literally being slaughtered and starved on the US’s dime and the president is still voicing support in the face of the atrocities we are all witnessing.”

              “But trump-“

              Just stop. No one here likes trump. We understand stacking domestic chaos on top of this issue is no good. But we are faced with no good option right now. The entire argument for voting for democrats over republicans is usually “but we can push the democrats through shame to do what is right.” THAT IS WHAT THIS IS.

              We’re not playing politics. We’re playing try to save some goddamn lives with civil disobedience.

                • TheFriar@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  8
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Like, it’s something we all understand. But that doesn’t absolve the Biden admin’s full-dive involvement. This administration is complicit in genocide.

                  That doesn’t mean another president wouldn’t be as well. The US as a country and entity is complicit. But that’s what we’re trying to change by calling out the weaker link—because the point isn’t playing politics. It’s stopping the genocide. What’s happening right now in Gaza is untenable. And Biden is supposed to be the better option—again, yes, we all understand trump would not be better. But that doesn’t change what’s happening. We need to be able to pressure our representatives, especially when they claim to be morally superior to the “other” party. And especially when they’re more likely to change. We have Biden over the barrel because it’s an election year, and he’s seeing a ton of pressure from people he needs the votes of. Hats leverage we don’t typically have. We need to use it. Also, it’s fuckin genocide. I don’t know how else to say it. And it needs to stop. This isn’t us claiming anything except we don’t want what’s happening to continue. We’re not discussing the election. This supersedes it.

                  This is what we need to do. Because, the point is stopping the genocide. Not playing politics. And that’s what you just can’t see past. Like I said, we voted for Biden knowing he was supposed to be the more morally sound option. And here he is participating in genocide. We are trying to push the president who is vulnerable on this issue to do the right thing. That’s what needs to happen. BECAUSE THERE IS A FUCKING GENOCIDE TAKING PLACE. That fact isn’t going away, no matter how much of a disaster trump would be. This president is vulnerable on the issue, and the point isn’t politics. It’s stopping a goddamn genocide.

                  What is your point you’re making here? Because you’re not saying anything anyone else doesn’t know. But that doesn’t we shouldn’t be skewering Biden for this. Because he holds the reins of power. This is what we should be doing, if not more.

            • ByteJunk@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              You make it sound like that’s something you’d expect would happen out of his own volition?

      • CptEnder@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you know who’s currently sending weapons to Israel?

        Hint: it’s not Biden.

        • EndlessApollo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 months ago

          ???

          What’s up with liberals on lemmy telling blatant obvious lies? We both know he bypassed congress multiple times to send them weapons, who are you trying to convince here?

    • force@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      How is that relevant to this? Are people not allowed to protest now because “other guy would be worse”? That’s an actual authoritarian tactic.

      This isn’t saying “Trump would be better”. This is saying “Biden supporting a genocide is unacceptable”.

      • Urist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        8 months ago

        Woaah. Hold up there cowboy. Are you suggesting we hold politicians responsible for their policy?

      • ObliviousEnlightenment@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s very counterproductive given the two party system, yes. Especially when you consider Congress is restricting a lot of what he can do, he does not have the power to just cut off any foreign power he wants

          • daltotron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            Our profitable and innovative medical industrial complex, their ineffective and authoritarian free healthcare, etc

    • cybersin@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, we should all pretend everything’s fine so that after the election happens we can keep sending bombs to do genocide.

    • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      I personally fully agree with the image created by the protestors AND plan on voting for Biden.

        • TonyOstrich@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not quite. I will criticize him ruthlessly while in the same breath acknowledging that he is the best realistic option we have and stating others should also vote for him. I know the masses are dumb and easily swayed, but staying silent isn’t something I am morally OK with. What I am doing is the compromise I have made with myself that best takes all of my personal beliefs and ethics into account.

    • John_McMurray@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      “You should vote for a person enabling genocide because the other candidate hypothetically would have done worse in an alternate reality, maybe.” Real high iq take there.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        Whataboutism is an appeal to hypocrisy. We are facing a general election, talking about the opposing candidate is necessary.

        • OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          8 months ago

          So if two candidates are in direct competition, it’s fair to respond to criticism of one by bringing up problems with the other.

          Does this logic also hold if you replace the word “candidate” with “country?”

    • PopcornTin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Yeah, because what I imagine will happen is far more important than what is happening!