• MxM111@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    70 Wh/Kg is indeed very low density comparing with today’s li-ion 300 Wh/kg.

    • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah but for many low-power applications, it’s a damn cool development. Like I have a bluetooth keyboard and a few controllers that could eaisly fit a battery 3x-4x the current size inside no problem, so there’s no need to waste lithium on that.

    • haui@lemmy.giftedmc.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      At 1000 times the abundancy, it is already 233 times better for stationary applications than lithium ion, no?