• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    202 months ago

    They write

    “Of course, AMD is trying to get into the the AI training and inferencing game itself with the Instinct MI300 chip. And that, perhaps, is the main if modest cause for hope. If AMD can gain some traction in that huge market, it will not only be making lots of money, it will be in a position to do a similar thing to Nvidia and push some of that technology across into its gaming GPUs.”

    which strikes me as incorrect. AMD MI is pretty widespread in HPC. With margins lower in the consumer market it makes sense to focus on HPC.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 months ago

    Hopefully we start to see further cuts - AMD really needs to position itself as a value competitor to Nvidia. There’s no reason the 7900 XTX or XT launched at the price they did, let alone the rest of the 7000 series.

  • velox_vulnus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    82 months ago

    Perhaps my evaluation is wrong here, but AMD seems to be doing the right thing with iGPU. Granted, they’re not customizable, but perhaps, there could be a new market for a generation that seems to not want to deal with the burden of modular parts? Maybe laptops and tiny-factor PC cases?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      62 months ago

      Personally I’m getting rid of my GTX 1080 in favor of an AMD iGPU next time I upgrade, so it would seem to me that it’s the right path.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I don’t know how far down the line that upgrade might be, but I’ve recently used both a 1080 and the latest-gen (see reply below) an AMD igpu (7600x) and I gotta say the 1080 is still significantly more powerful. Maybe if the upgrade is soon hold off on selling the 1080 until you see if you’re satisfied with the igpu performance?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          42 months ago

          It’s not even about performance; I just don’t play anything that can justify a discreet GPU and I’m imagining the idle power draw is gonna be significantly better on a CPU with an integrated GPU than a CPU+GPU.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            71 month ago

            Alright, I’m gonna be that guy:

            You said “discreet GPU”, that would mean something like a GPU that is careful, guarded, and keeps your secrets.

            I think you meant a “discrete GPU”, which would mean a GPU that is distinct and separate from the rest of the system, so not built into the same silicon as the CPU or motherboard.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          31 month ago

          Aren’t 8600g and 8700g the latest iGPU offerings from AMD, with significant increases over 7000 line iGPUs? The 5000G series had better iGPUs than the 7000 series.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              21 month ago

              They launched earlier this year, but being AM5 it usually is still cheaper to grab a 5000 series processor and discrete GPU, but definitely nice for a SFF build.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11 month ago

          The igpu in the 7600x is not meant for gaming. It can’t even run 1080p RuneScape 3 on normal settings without lag. Only runs fine with minimum settings. Even a GTX 770 is much more powerful.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    -292 months ago

    Maybe if they weren’t playing stupid games with the open source Linux graphics driver it would help. I know I won’t be upgrading to a newer AMD card until that mess is properly sorted.