I guess this could just as easily be posted in an anti-work community

  • Inventa@lemmy.fmhy.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’d love to understand the logic and benefit of come two days a week. But the real reason, not the bullshit they say

    • EnglishMobster@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      77
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’ve invested a lot of money in office real estate and hate that it’s going to waste.

      Also, CEOs tend to be extroverts who want to be around people. They’re also sociopaths who think everyone is like them (or they don’t care what others think).

      Combine the two and you get this.

      • whatisallthis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also no one actually knows how long tasks take.

        If you work from home and only work for 4 hours, lots of managers do not know how to tell if that work you did took 8 hours or 4. In the office they have plausible deniability that they saw you there doing something.

      • TheBestUsername@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’ve invested a lot of money in office real estate and hate that it’s going to waste.

        But see this makes no sense. The money invested is gone (or contractually tied up). Using it won’t make it a good investment.

        It’s like if you bought a car and then moved somewhere where you’re like 1 minute walking from work, the grocery store, the hair salon,.and the best restaurants, and you never travel otherwise. The money spent on the car is objectively wasted. Using your car unnecessarily to drive places you (a) wouldn’t normally go to or (b) don’t need a car to get to is not only pointless, but actually costs MORE MONEY because of gas and maintenance (or for a building, energy and cleaning).

        • DrDickHandler@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s more to it. Companies are getting tax breaks and tax exemptions to bring in people to the office to “stimulate” the ecconony.

          • TheBestUsername@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ahh. Didn’t know about the tax breaks. Makes sense. You know, as much as if “makes sense” to be forcing people to spend more time and money traveling instead of working or spending time with their families.

    • Moegle@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      No idea whether it’s their reason, but anecdotally I’ve found it has a few benefits. If coordinated properly it’s significantly easier to train new(er) staff, it improves cross-organisational understanding to overhear other departments’ conversations either at desks or in break rooms, and it stops people becoming isolated pockets of knowledge and culture because they only ever see or interact with the same one or two people.

    • teejay@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because the people creating these mandates don’t have to suffer them. They come and go as they please, and they don’t work in the pit open office space. They have real offices with furniture, walls, and doors that shut.

    • WilliamTheWicked@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I can help you. The benefit is strictly for the maintenance of th bullshit status quo and the logic is, once you’re already coming in two days a week, it’ll be an easier fight to ask for a third. Then a fourth. And so on.