• lad
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    You mean, compared to what goes to the market for people?

    I don’t eat much of not industrial agriculture products, even local farms only produce fruits, and I would say they are also industrial (not sure where is the line)

    • Bademantel@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Cows and other farm animals need a lot of food:

      More than three-quarters of global agricultural land is used for livestock, despite meat and dairy making up a much smaller share of the world’s protein and calories. […] However, only half of the world’s croplands are used to grow crops that are consumed by humans directly. We use a lot of land to grow crops for biofuels and other industrial products, and an even bigger share is used to feed livestock.

      Source (OWID)

      • OfCourseNot@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        As per the article two thirds of that ‘agricultural land’ is graze-lands, so like a 12.5% of that agricultural land is actually farmland dedicated to feed livestock.

      • lad
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        I see, 25% is still not too little, I expected this to be less than 10% based on how you phrased the first comment. But you’re right, it’s possible to greatly reduce strain on land

    • flora_explora@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Not only that. But our agriculture is so centered around animals that we also have a huge surplus of manure (the animals’ feces, horn shavings, basically anything left of them) that we then use on all kinds of plant crops. It is so baked into the system that it will be a long way before we can really get a animal-free agriculture…