• skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    6 months ago

    so your process of getting legal advice is:

    1. ask chatgpt, which will output convincing blob of text, with references and sources that might or might be not real, relevant, or make sense, some of which you won’t be able to judge
    2. then, ask a real lawyer about this, which means that they have to make sense of the situation on their own but also dig through machine generated drivel, which means that they need more time for that, and this means extra cost/wasted effort

    how does that simplify anything

    • froztbyte@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      Look it’s a really cheap and fast way of going from potential lawsuit to actual damages! That’s progress, that is!

      [ed note: since I can’t markup-joke it in a way that survives lemmy: to be read in pratchett voice)

    • Tja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Do you enjoy arguing against arguments that nobody made?

      • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Not the worst? 48th percentile is basically “average lawyer”. I don’t need a Supreme Court lawyer to argue my parking ticket.

        In a worst case scenario if my local lawyer can use AI to generate a letter and just quickly go through it to make sure it didn’t hallucinate

        • Tja
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Exactly. Now compare it to what you wrote.