I was Nobara user, then I am using Fedora right now. I want to use things like Hyprland etc. and ya know, Its damn cool to say I am using arch btw. So I’ve decided to use Arch Linux. But everyone says its always breaking and gives problems. That’s because of users, not OS… right? I love to deal with problems but I don’t want to waste my time. Is Arch really problemful OS? Should I use it? I know what to do with setup/ usage, the hardness of Arch is not problem for me but I am just concerned about the mindset “Arch always gets broken”.

  • chi-chan~@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Like I said in the post on c/archlinux, I had more problems on ‘user-friendly’ distros, than I had on Arch.

    • LeFantome
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Me too. I have had more problems with the “stable” ones too I often break things trying to work around missing packages.