• lysdexic
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    I feel this sort of endeavour is just a poorly researches attempt at reinventing the wheel. Packaging formats such as Debian’s .DEB format consist basically of the directory tree structure to be deployed archived with Zip along with a couple of metadata files. It’s not rocket science. In contrast, these tricks sound like overcomplicated hacks.

    • AijanOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      Author here. In case it’s not clear, this article isn’t about installing Linux packages; it’s about deploying multiple versions of software to development and production environments.

      • lysdexic
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        it’s about deploying multiple versions of software to development and production environments.

        What do you think a package is used for? I mean, what do you think “delivery” in “continuous delivery” means, and what’s it’s relationship with the deployment stage?

        Again, a cursory search for the topic would stop you from wasting time trying to reinvent the wheel.

        https://wiki.debian.org/DebianAlternatives

        Deviam packages support pre and post install scripts. You can also bundle a systemd service with your Deb packages. You can install multiple alternatives of the same package and have Debian switch between them seemlessly. All this is already available by default for over a decade.

        • AijanOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          6 months ago

          Seriously, why the negative tone? If I’ve offended you, I’m sorry. You might think that I’m wasting time, but there are multiple ways to skin a cat. I prefer not to use DEB packages for deployment, though others might.