• qyron@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      It should. An open technology standard should gain traction over closed proprietary ones.

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Aren’t the new Apple chips ARM? If they are, then ARM is absolutely in the present, and proven viable for consumers by Apple.

            • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              6 months ago

              If apple is viable for consumers, and apple uses ARM, then ARM is viable for consumers.

              Windows and Linux being unfortunately behind is not an argument against ARM being viable, it shows it’s not ready - however, apple was in the same situation before they moved to ARM, so theoretically Microsoft could attempt a similar investment and push towards ARM. Apple’s control over both hardware and software certainly helped them, and went well for them.

              That said, maybe it’s a disagreement on terminology. When I say that ARM is viable, I mean that it’s ready to create hardware and software that does what people need it to do. Apple clearly succeeded, now it’s a question of if/when manufacturers start making open hardware and software starts compatibility… Or if maybe another option will succeed instead.