• lorkano@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    31
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    And they didn’t use her voice. Article clearly states that she said she is shocked they choose similar voice to her after she declined. It makes sense for open Ai to choose similar one because when they were preparing list of the voices they obviously wanted voice to be of her kind. It’s not like her voice is something so fucking unique she has copyright over all of the similar voices in the world

    • soba@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      And despite all your lame denials they are shutting that voice down. Why is that?

      • alexdeathway
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        compliance isn’t admission of guilt but again it’s OPENAI.

      • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Because lawsuits are expensive, even when you’re not guilty.

        I don’t think they’d be stupid enough to lie about hiring a voice actress for a voice model when they didn’t.

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        6 months ago

        I guess every out of court settlement is an admission of guilt in your eyes? It’s nothing to do with the massive amount of money wasted dealing with legal matters or anything.