• deweydecibel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    but Congress would rather ratify Roe v. Wade (which they should) into law than see marijuana legalization.

    I acknowledge that you said “they should”, so that’s good, but I have to question why you even thought to use that example? In what world would they not prioritize that? Even if they were all pro-legalizing marijuana, Roe is a decidedly more important issue.

    Realistically they would just do both things at once but if we’re going to commit to this hypothetical where they can only do one thing at a time, yeah, it goes without saying protecting women’s reproductive rights (that were only recently taken away) is more pressing than pot.

    • Franklin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      I used this example because our Republican Congress and SCOTUS hates women and bodily autonomy.

    • realbadat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 months ago

      In what world would they not prioritize that?

      The current one where Republicans have control of the House.