0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agoNeuralink Can Implant Second Person With a Brain Chip, FDA Saysgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square102fedilinkarrow-up1202arrow-down125
arrow-up1177arrow-down1external-linkNeuralink Can Implant Second Person With a Brain Chip, FDA Saysgizmodo.com0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 5 months agomessage-square102fedilink
minus-squareatrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoBecause you both made assumptions. Just because your assumptions were not about the article itself doesn’t mean that you didn’t make assumptions.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoThe assumption you claimed I made was in relation to a fact I stated that’s in the article. Wtf are you on about, specifically?
minus-squareatrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoNo. The assumption was that the other person had the context you had from the article, and chose to call someone stupid. But I don’t know why you’re even bothering with this. You obviously don’t agree and that’s fine.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoYou’re attempting to change what you accused me of assuming. But in your attempt to be not wrong, you made yourself even more wrong. I made no assumption that they read the article. I was actually pretty sure they didn’t, in typical Lemmy fashion. So it’s not actually you assuming. Lol And why do you keep on acting like I’m the only one keeping this conversation going? You’ve responded to me as much as I’ve responded to you.
minus-squareEatATaco@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months ago I don’t know why you’re even bothering with this Should have known this was some sort of projection.
minus-squareatrielienz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoBuddy, just give it up. I don’t care that much.
Because you both made assumptions. Just because your assumptions were not about the article itself doesn’t mean that you didn’t make assumptions.
The assumption you claimed I made was in relation to a fact I stated that’s in the article. Wtf are you on about, specifically?
No. The assumption was that the other person had the context you had from the article, and chose to call someone stupid. But I don’t know why you’re even bothering with this. You obviously don’t agree and that’s fine.
You’re attempting to change what you accused me of assuming. But in your attempt to be not wrong, you made yourself even more wrong.
I made no assumption that they read the article. I was actually pretty sure they didn’t, in typical Lemmy fashion.
So it’s not actually you assuming. Lol
And why do you keep on acting like I’m the only one keeping this conversation going? You’ve responded to me as much as I’ve responded to you.
Sure.
Should have known this was some sort of projection.
Buddy, just give it up. I don’t care that much.
Your actions betray your words.