• Brownian Motion
      link
      fedilink
      9411 months ago

      This.

      I can handle DDMMYY[YY] it reads correctly. But YYYYMMDD is numerically correct, most signifcant to least significant digitwise.

      That thing only American’s do, is completely non-sensical.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        1511 months ago

        For sorting or filing, I agree. I think in day to day life, though, Day and month are way more significant. So I actually prefer DDMMYYYY for that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          2111 months ago

          DDMMYYYY would be great, if it weren’t for 95% of Americans that use MMDDYYYY. Is 07/02/2000 July 2nd or Feb 7th?

          Thus the only solution is to write out the month or start with the year, because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM. Plus by using YYYYMMDD you get the added benefit of the dates all being sortable using dumber applications.

          • ibk
            link
            fedilink
            411 months ago

            because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM

            You are saying it like if MMDDYYYY made any sense. To someone who uses MMDDYYYY daily, they could think of YYYYMMDD as “Its like the usual but backwards” and now you have a group of people reading it as YYYYDDMM.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              311 months ago

              You could convince a group of people to use YYYYDDMM, but what I mean is nobody currently uses it. So at this moment of time YYYYMMDD is intuitive, and has a miniscule chance of being mixed up like DDMMYYYY and MMDDYYYY (because a large number of people use these formats).

              Please don’t convince Americans to use YYYYDDMM lol. :-)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            Makes sense, I just mostly interact with Europeans, so I don’t encounter this problem a lot. I really don’t have a problem with YYYYMMDD though anyway.

          • @Paralda
            link
            111 months ago

            It’s because that’s how we talk. We say October 5th, not the 5th of October.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              511 months ago

              English people say October 5th. Spanish people say 5 de Octubre. Same for other languages. That’s probably why Europeans prefer the other format.

              • @Paralda
                link
                111 months ago

                Yeah I was talking about Americans specifically

        • Fushuan [he/him]
          link
          fedilink
          111 months ago

          I still prefer yyyymmdd for day to day. If year is irrelevant just skip it. If you only use a date format you get used to it and it becomes the most efficient one due to consistency. Sidenote, in my language the default date format is actually yyyymmdd.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        811 months ago

        I absolutely loath the American favorite: 8/9. Like fuck, is that August 9th, September 8th, or just a fraction??

      • Icalasari
        link
        fedilink
        -3
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        It is sensical for one use:

        “So when is the event?”
        “May 20th, 2024”

        It’s such a niche use, though

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          5311 months ago

          I think that’s because you’re used to hearing dates said that way? Over here in DDMMYY-land, we often would say “20th of May, 2024” and that sounds equally sensical to me tbh

          • IWantToFuckSpez
            link
            fedilink
            1111 months ago

            And in a lot of countries they just say 20 May, 2024. So no ordinal numbers for the day.

        • nevial
          link
          fedilink
          611 months ago

          I know you’ve been bashed already by others, but could you elaborate on why this is sensical?

          • Icalasari
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            In a, “Alright I guess that technically works and at least can follow the logic”. It’s pretty damn niche, however (who is going to ask for two or more years in advanced for a date and not go, “Just text/email it”? Heck, even this is pushing it, but I can at least follow the logic)

            Could be that I’m slightly fucking up definitions in my head, it was a long day yesterday

        • stebo
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          In what way is it sensible?

          I get that you prefer saying it like that, just because you’re used to it. It is conventional but definitely in no way sensible.

          • Icalasari
            link
            fedilink
            111 months ago

            In that it at least has a use that one can go, “Alright I guess that technically works”

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -6
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      So if you communicate with someone you will specify the date in the year 2023 september 23rd we shall meet and not 23rd of september 🧐

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1311 months ago

      Hungarians feeling superior with their YYYY.MM.DD fornat.

      Although that’s not ideal for URLs

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        6
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        I believe this is still valid according to ISO 8601 so have an upvote. It also works fine in URLs after the host part.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        111 months ago

        If I had a forint for something matching order in Hungary and Japan, I would have 2 forints, which isn’t a lot but its weird it happened twice. (Its the order of names and dates)

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      411 months ago

      For history, sure, but for day to day stuff I think I can remember what year it is and don’t need it right at the front lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1911 months ago

        I use this for notes, and generally everything written; mainly for reference when looking back on old information. Today, whether I say Wednesday the 9th, or 2023-08-09, it’s fairly inconsequential, but in 2-3 years if I have to reference a note, email or something else where I said today’s date, I won’t have to compare the date of the note to the calendar for that time period to see which 9th was on a Wednesday.

        Everything you do now becomes history, so adapting to this format makes it easier when today becomes your history.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -5
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      But we read left to right and the most important part is furthest right hardest to read. It’s convenient for computers sorting alphabetically, but bad for people reading it.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 months ago

          Why? The year changes least quickly, (especially the decade) so you can often infer without needing it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            211 months ago

            Because it’s the most significant. If it’s wrong or missing you’re off by much more than if the day or month is wrong.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -111 months ago

              But that’s good, like a parity check. Because your wrong by much more, it’s easier to tell from context clues. That’s why people abbreviated the year to ‘in 98’ or something like that.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Okay, hear me out.

        With other numbers, non-date numbers, we put the numbers representing the most quantity to the left, and numbers representing the last quantity to the right, eg 1 hundred, ten and 1 would be 111, where the number representing 100 qty comes first from the left, and each position moving to the right, represents a smaller and smaller amount.

        Since years are longer than months, which are longer than days, the YYYY-MM-DD format actually follows the same convention that we commonly use for all other numbering systems, big on the left, small on the right.

        So why would the date be the exception?

      • geogle
        link
        fedilink
        411 months ago

        I tried reading your comment right to left and was left even more confused.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2711 months ago

    I like DDMMYY but for some reason when I include the time as ss:mm:hh nobody shows up to the event on time.

  • Carlos Solís
    link
    fedilink
    English
    26
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Tired: ISO date format

    Wired: milliseconds since the Unix Epoch

    Galactic brain: Planck time units since the Big Bang

      • Carlos Solís
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Not if you encode it using an exponent. One Planck time unit is roughly 1.8 x 10-43 seconds, so with an exponent of 2128 (roughly 3.4 x 1038) you could write a second as 54510 x 2128 TP

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1911 months ago

    I always wonder why old memes are losing pixels and quality. Like an old paper shared over the years.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      2011 months ago

      It’s because people keep taking screenshots of the image and sharing the screenshot instead of the original image file. It’s like making a copy of a copy of a copy until it looks like garbage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 months ago

        Stop right there criminal scum, you are not allow to publish original copyrighted works, you are stealing from the artist’s mouth by squandering his market value !

        So that’s why normal people screenshot.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1511 months ago

      because they get downloaded from say reddit and then reuploaded again a year later or so which since most sites/services compress files uploaded they get worse and worse quality

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1611 months ago

    I’d have to say April 25th because it’s not too hot, not too cold. All you need is a light jacket.

  • kkard2
    link
    fedilink
    English
    14
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    to make things as not confusing as possible, my rule of thumb is:

    • yyyy-mm-dd (yyyy instead of yy ensures that it’s not mistaken for dd-mm-yy) (hyphens can be replaced with underscores)
    • dd.mm.yyyy (yyyy same as above) (really dislike using for filenames, sorting doesn’t work)
    • mm/dd/yyyy (only if there is no other choice) edit: mm/dd/yyyy vs mm/dd/yy doesn’t matter because both make 0 sense already edit2: i forgor to say that yyyy also avoids y2.1k and subsequent issues
    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      611 months ago

      Wow, TIL. Whenever I’m down on my life’s accomplishments, I’ll just remember that this tried to happen.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        211 months ago

        One might ponder: is it better to be forgotten or be forever remembered for attempting something silly?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      211 months ago

      I used to have a Swatch watch some 20 years ago that displayed internet time. It was such a cool (and nerdy) idea 🤓

  • ForbiddenRoot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    1011 months ago

    To eliminate this confusion I propose the days of the month should start from 13.

    • @jimmux
      link
      4
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Do we really even need months? They don’t even line up with the lunar cycle like they pretend to do.

      Just give us Year/Day. On leap years we get an extra long New Year holiday.