The former president complained that his sentencing is set to take place days before the Republican National Convention

Donald Trump says he wants the Supreme Court to intervene in his upcoming sentencing on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records.

“The ‘Sentencing’ for not having done anything wrong will be, conveniently for the Fascists, 4 days before the Republican National Convention,” Trump wrote Sunday night on Truth Social, complaining that Judge Juan Merchan was an “‘Acting’ Local Judge, appointed by the Democrats, who is HIGHLY CONFLICTED” to “make a decision which will determine the future of our Nation.”

“The United States Supreme Court MUST DECIDE!” Trump added in an appeal to the nation’s highest court.

  • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Technically the US supreme court can stick their dick in anything, there’s a legal option that allows them to just cut in whenever they feel like it.

    There’s no regular appeals process that reaches the US federal supreme court for a New York state criminal case though.

    • dhork@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      7 months ago

      As far as I know, the Supreme Court can’t get involved in a state matter until all appeals in that state have been resolved, and even then won’t take up the matter unless there is some connection to Federal law (and that connection was raised at some point in the trial by one of the parties).

      But this court might invoke the ancient rite of “Because I said so” to justify letting Trump off the hook, I suppose.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think the Florida Supreme Court was still dealing with Bush v Gore when the Supreme Court jumped in. Although, I guess that one did have a more direct relationship to Federal law. But it was 100% bullshit, regardless.

        • bazus1@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          Ah yes, Bush v Gore. I’m fairly certain that Y2K is where our current shitty timeline diverged from the good one.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 months ago

            No, it was 2012. The mayans were totally right, it just wasn’t the sudden flip switch end of days people expected. :p

            • bazus1@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              “Mr. Architect, please, try the Utopia setting again. I promise we won’t reject it!”

              • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                If that wasn’t tbe most boomer bullshit. “We met everyone’s needs, and people still weren’t happy.” Fuck outta here, like you couldn’t drop every person who ever lived naked on a beach with margaritas and nachos for them to spend eternity.

      • Fal@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        As far as I know, the Supreme Court can’t get involved in a state matter until all appeals in that state have been resolved, and even then won’t take up the matter unless

        This is only because how the process normally works. But if they really wanted to get involved there’s not really much that could stop them