We all knew it

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      6 months ago

      I haven’t read the article yet, but surely they can’t be juxtaposing waterfall as the alternative to agile. The modern alternative, especially in small to medium businesses, would be kanban.

      • CameronDev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Kanban is Agile. They are pushing Impact Engineering.

        • drphungky@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Ehhhh…Kanban is much older than Agile even if they tried to subsume it and say it’s an agile technique, so that’s sort of right. But kanban vs “scrum” - which virtually everyone means when they say “agile” - is fair.

          • CameronDev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Within my company there is a mix of Scrum and Kanban, so Agile != Scrum.

            I don’t think it makes much sense to say “We are switching from Agile to Kanban”, but “We are switching from Scrum to Kanban” does make sense (at least to me)