Krafting@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 months agothe fear of missing out a better compressionlemmy.worldimagemessage-square190fedilinkarrow-up1941arrow-down19file-text
arrow-up1932arrow-down1imagethe fear of missing out a better compressionlemmy.worldKrafting@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square190fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareu/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up22·7 months ago7z is available for Linux as well (CLI only) It is open-source too.
minus-squareyouRFate@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoI know, but I’d say ppl on Linux tend to not use it.
minus-squarenexussapphire@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·7 months agoWhen I was on windows I just used 7zip for everything. Multi core decompress is so much better than Microsoft’s slow single core nonsense from the 90s.
minus-squareBaroqueInMind@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down2·7 months agoSmall dick package kings/queens rise up.
minus-squareLucidlethargy@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up9arrow-down3·7 months agoYeah, 7z is the clear winner.
minus-squaresparkle@lemm.eelinkfedilinkCymraegarrow-up1·edit-27 months agoIt’s much slower to decompress than DEFLATE ZIP though
Where .7z at
On windows.
7z is available for Linux as well (CLI only)
It is open-source too.
I know, but I’d say ppl on Linux tend to not use it.
.7z gang, represent
When I was on windows I just used 7zip for everything. Multi core decompress is so much better than Microsoft’s slow single core nonsense from the 90s.
Small
dickpackage kings/queens rise up.Yeah, 7z is the clear winner.
It’s much slower to decompress than DEFLATE ZIP though