Headline: Libertarians be like Picture of disugested women next to “Tyranny.gov” Picture of intressted women next to “Tyranny.com

  • BossDj@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think another implication here is they trust a corporation more than a government

    • d00ery@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I’m not condoning this, but one argument I’ve heard is that it’s easier to pick a different corporation (i.e. don’t buy from them) than it is to change your government (every 4 years ish) and it’s only the political party, not the civil service / employees (or whatever it’s called in the USA) that change.

      Of course monopolies, huge barriers to entry for new companies, etc, weaken this argument.

      As a final note; I think the combination of unions, govt., and private enterprise is the best we can hope for under the existing system.

      • GraniteM@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        ·
        5 months ago

        it’s easier to pick a different corporation (i.e. don’t buy from them)

        This argument also falls apart when the thing you want to buy is essential and/or all of the companies selling it are horrible (or the very concept of selling it at a profit is horrible), e.g. health insurance, water, housing, staple foods, and so forth.

          • Strykker
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            But that’s exactly what libertarians want to do. They want the government to manage nothing and just let corps do everything with no oversight.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        We have cooperatives in a lot of forms being part of our existing system. This is in the form of housing coops, cooperative banks, cooperative stores and worker owned companies. All of them survive and some even thrive in our current system. Mostly they are growing slowly, if at all, but are much more stable and fiscally conservative. They can even work very well on natural monopolies as utility cooperatives have shown.

        There are also legal setups like trusts, which can be very benefitial, if done right.

      • Ziglin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Hear me out: Instead of companies we have various non profit organisations that evenly supply people with goods and have to keep their expenses completely transparent.

        I’m sure there’s some issues with this and I’m curious to hear them but I feel like this would still be far better than corporations and especially monopolies or oligopolies trying to take our money. (I hope it’s clear that these organisations wouldn’t have to be like existing ones just operate similarly and I don’t care about it not counting as a non profit organisation in some existing government.)