• echutaa
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Which inflation rate are you quoting, the true rate including food and fuel or an abstraction that ignores those inelastic categories?

      • echutaa
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        12 months is a poor timeframe to use for inflation when the most relevant data to consumers today is 2021-2022, and again fuel is required to function in the US which I don’t see in CPI making it a poor indicator for real finances. Really though my point is metrics can be manipulated to sound good or bad but ignoring consumer sentiment is foolish for a politician seeking to be elected by those consumers.

        • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The most relevant data is the most recent data.

          I don’t care about 2022 data, because I’m no longer paid in 2022 dollars or paying 2022 prices.

          • echutaa
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            By that logic we should only read last months data and forget the rest of history, but in reality people have memories and incorporate previous experience in their sentiment.

            • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 months ago

              The most relevant data is the most recent data. You don’t have to “forget the rest is history”, but it is less relevant than the present.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Those two numbers you are asking about (“true rate” or the abstraction), for the recent past, pretty much work out to the same value.

      The CPI excludes some volatile categories, but it’s not a trick, in this case.

      The tactic of bringing up that the CPI excludes some categories, and implying that if it did include them, it would show more inflation than what it does (including the pretty significant spike in 2022)… that actually is a trick, actually a pretty subtle and clever one. To make people think the economy is getting worse, when it’s getting better.

      Edit: I made a top level comment with the guidebook to some of the other tricks

        • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I didn’t actually know that, thank you. Yeah, I know there is some commonly cited “inflation” number that excludes some volatile categories but over the last couple years that actually doesn’t change the bottom line - but yeah, it makes sense that CPI would include all the common consumer goods regardless of volatility.

          • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            “Core inflation”, as the name suggests, excludes some things that are encompassed by CPI. But I think it’s cited much less often than CPI.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Honestly I have to admit I’ve become a little bit jaded with hundreds of times looking some particular claim up and learning about things and finding that someone who was swearing some particular thing, was lying; and I’ve gotten lazy about it as a result

              It’s almost as if all the “Biden ruined the economy” trolls are consistently not being 100% truthful and straightforward about things