• rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Yeah I think awareness where they ruin yachts and private planes is better than destroying common cultural heritage. Wtf

    • eksb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      They probably know that if they put corn starch on Stonehenge they’ll be in jail for a few days and get community service, but if they put spray paint on a billionaire’s yacht, they’d get shot.

      • Windex007@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        Well the top comment was “fuck these people” so if the goal was to build broad public support it is having the opposite effect.

        Alternatively, EVERYONE is cheering for those fucking Orcas, so… Imagine being dumber than a whale.

      • neonred@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        “It will go away, no harm done” is your stance? Well, there is harm done, if not only on the societies feeling of sanity and security. What was the purpose of that action? To seed shock and “ruffle some feathers”, sow disbalance under the coat of “shaking sleeping people up”.

        “No harm done”? Well, then let me waterboard you, hit you, hit your wife and children. The blue specks will go away, no harm done. Your psychological effects? They will go away, seek therapy. You’re still less affected people than the society.

        Of course this was sarcasm. But think about what stance you just took and reflect.

        • notabot@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          What was the purpose of that action? To seed shock and “ruffle some feathers”, sow disbalance under the coat of “shaking sleeping people up”.

          A goal at which it has singularly failed. There’ll be a bit of noise in the papers for a day or two, Stonehenge will be cleaned off with “No harm done” and life will move on with no useful change.

          Their stunts were effective the first time or two, but now are largely ignored or even just cause irritation.

          If they, indeed we, want to change the trajectory of human caused climate damage we need to build bridges at the community level and bring people together to force the hand of the political class. These stunts don’t do that, they just give ammunition to those who seek to prevent positive change.

        • eksb
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          Are you suggesting stones suffer psychological effects?

    • ThePyroPython@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Ah but you see then JustStopOil’s millionaire founder might have his expensive toys damaged then.

    • underscore_@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Maybe it’s that this is a better a metaphor for the destruction of the common cultural heritage of the environment? Not many people can relate to or are inconvenienced by a very expensive private boat sinking.