• Wrench@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean, distributing it isn’t a small feat. Plus you need to manage subscriptions, billings, CMS, a front end to navigate the content, etc.

    That’s no small amount of work, even if they used out of the box solutions for many layers.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      All of those things already exist. Typically it’s just a Plex server running on a cloud service.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Both Wikipedia and Stack Overflow just have a few dozen fast servers despite being some of the world’s highest trafficked websites

      • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        The entire content of the wikipedia fits in a pen drive.

        Streaming video is a lot more expensive than text and images.

        • Irelephant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          That is just the text content, Wikipedia has pictures and videos as well. Not to mention the other Wikimedia projects

      • Tja
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Not only that, stackoverflow does it using windows! (or used to, at least)