starman to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agoAnon thinks about Googleimagemessage-square346fedilinkarrow-up11.21Karrow-down134
arrow-up11.17Karrow-down1imageAnon thinks about Googlestarman to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square346fedilink
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down2·6 months agoLower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
minus-squareKazumara@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up10·edit-26 months agoI would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
minus-squareDog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·6 months agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-squarepumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 months agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
Lower end phones usually already have 8 GB RAM (example: Galaxy A54 5G, 300€ new).
I would consider the A-Series of Samsung “mid-range”. I know you said “lower” and “mid-range” is lower than “high-end”, but I suspect tetris11’s issue mostly applies to “low-end” phones. Something like a Motorola Moto G Play 2024
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
To a certain point.