These are Lemmy instances with a “Sign Up” link which present you with a form to fill out to register. Then after you fill out the form and supply information like email address to the server, they respond with “registration closed”:

I suppose it’s unlikely to be malice considering how many there are. It’s likely a case of shitty software design. There should be a toggle for open/closed registration and when it’s closed there should be no “Sign Up” button in the first place. And if someone visits the registration URL despite a lack of Sign Up link, it should show a reg. closed announcement.

Guess it’s worth mentioning there are some instances that accept your application for review (often with interview field) but then either let your application rot (“pending application” forever) or they silently reject it (you only discover non-acceptance when you make a login attempt and either get “login failed” or even more rudely it just re-renders the login form with no msg). These nodes fall into the selective non-acceptance category:

To be fair, I use a disposable email address which could be a reason the 5 above to reject my application. And if they did give a reason via email, I would not see it. Not sure if that’s happening but that’s also a case of bad software. That is, when a login attempt is made, the server could present the rationale for refusal. Another software defect would be failing to instantly reject an unacceptible email address.

  • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pubEnglish
    81·
    4 months ago

    The cognitive dissonance in this Jesus Christ

    You don’t think providing an email from a throw away service would strike the software as a malicious user/spam bot???

    You keep talking like you know everything and then step onto rakes and start screaming about how it’s the gardeners fault (you live alone and do the gardening, naturally)

    • debanqued@beehaw.orgOPEnglish
      14·
      4 months ago

      The cognitive dissonance in this

      It seems you don’t know what that phrase means. It doesn’t follow from anything else you wrote why you think that.

      You don’t think providing an email from a throw away service would strike the software as a malicious user/spam bot???

      You don’t think that legitimate streetwise users secure themselves by supplying disposable email addresses???

      You keep talking like you know everything

      The post intends to solicit intelligent and civil discourse with logical reasoning, not the sort of ego-charged emotional hot-headed pissing contest you’re trying to bring here.

      • stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pubEnglish
        21·
        4 months ago

        Your post and subsequent comments say quite the opposite - they’re oozing ego-charged.

        Try coming from a place of genuine curiosity and not “this is wrong and stupid”

        I’m not interested in bickering with you about semantics of social conduct. Black boxing applications from disposable/abusable mechanisms is absolutely a-okay in cybersecurity terms.