• AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Well yeah. Wayland is a protocol, not an application. There’s nothing it can do except delegate to one of the two ends of the connection.

    • Kogasa
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      These things are specifically not defined by the protocol. They could be. They’re not, by design.

      • AVincentInSpace@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I agree that the deliberate design simplicity of vanilla Wayland is to its detriment, as does anyone who has ever interacted with Wayland. That said, there are extensions to the protocol which have been ratified by XDG and are supported by most compositors and applications that remedy most of those issues.

        • renzev@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          Isn’t that also more or less the case with X11? From what I understand, if you try to use bare Xorg without any extensions like Xfixes and Xdamage, it’s pretty miserable