Larian is having trouble fitting Baldur’s Gate III on the Xbox Series S, the lower-priced and lower-powered console in Microsoft’s ninth-generation lineup.

I was looking up more information on why there’s such an issue getting BG3 on Xbox, and found this article with a lot more detail on the topic.

EDIT: The issue isn’t graphics or frame rate; it’s memory. The article goes into detail.

  • Feyter
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Loading in memory and rendering are different things. Of course it needs to be rendered twice but also you cut resolution in half so rendered both screens is not that much more of work.

    • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Tell me you don’t know anything about game development without telling me you don’t know anything about game development.

          • Feyter
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Did I at some point say that I’m the most advanced expert?

            I just pointed out that many of the statements in the article don’t make sense from a logical point of view. Split screen with this game on the S will be possible, I’m sure it will, but that requires additional work to do regardless of what the reasoning behind this is.

            Now I just reading pointless sh*t Talk while I was trying to hold a technical conversation… But yes thank you all.

            • stopthatgirl7@kbin.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Dude, you rocked up saying both the writer and I didn’t “seam [sic] to know much about video game development,” then proceeded to be, well, loud and wrong about how split screen works. You can’t get defensive when you started out attacking.

              • Feyter
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Didn’t want to be offensive sorry if you felt that way.

                I think I made my point clear. Maybe I’m wrong about some details about split screen maybe we talking all about the same stuff but misunderstanding each other IDK. But again my main point is a different.

              • Feyter
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Because all my statements about split screen are actually just coming from general knowledge about game development and working on a network multiplayer game and assuming what would not be needed in local co-op I actually did some research about this topic now to make sure I didn’t had false assumptions here.

                This video here shows one Implementation of split screen https://youtu.be/tkBgYD0R8R4 of course this could be implemented differently by larian studios but I’m pretty sure the basic principle stays the same.

                And the basic principle is not running the game two times. It’s running two Views at the same time in the same world. So obviously there is no need to have everything twice in memory. So right now I don’t see anything about what I said about split screen being proven wrong.

                Of course there will be more load on the hardware for two players split screen but it’s not the game running two times.

                No questions that the a slower RAM compared to X or PS5 is causing bottleneck on the series S, never denied this, but this bottlenecks will go down in FPS performance and all of this can be worked around by developers by “optimising” the game. At which point this optimisation is seen as reduction in quality is up to debate. That’s what I want to say.