• MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Could they not hash the contents of the game’s folders and send that back to the server to confirm it’s not been tampered with?

    • Mikina
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      What stops you from tampering with the game folder, and changing the function that sends the hash, to send a pre-calculated and valid value, instead of calculating it from real files you are running?

    • JoshCodes
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      So save files exist. Also custom user content. So the hash will change accordingly. Plus some cheats don’t require a modification of game files anyway, they use memory analysis to get, say, the location of other player objects, then they manipulate local information to give the player an advantage. This is how aim hacks and wall hacks work.

      Cheats are hard to prevent for the sole reason of you don’t own the computer they could be running on. You can’t trust the user or the machine, and have to design accordingly. This leads many to the “solution” that is kernel level anticheat, it gives total access to the system.

    • Zangoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Games probably do this in some way already with something like a checksum but the problem is you could have some separate program reading from game state/display at runtime to get around this. That’s part of why a lot of cheats are installed at a kernel-level.