Fresh off victories in other legal cases, Donald Trump on Monday pressed a New York appeals court to overturn the nearly $500 million New York civil fraud judgment that threatens to drain his personal cash reserves as he campaigns to retake the White House.

In paperwork filed with the state’s mid-level appeals court, the former president’s lawyers said Manhattan Judge Arthur Engoron’s Feb. 16 finding that Trump lied to banks, insurers and others about his wealth was “erroneous” and “egregious.”

His lawyers argued that New York Attorney General Letitia James’ lawsuit should have been promptly dismissed, the statute of limitations barred some allegations, that no one was harmed by Trump’s alleged fraud and that James’ involvement in private business transactions threatens to drive business out of the state.

  • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Well… I guess this, as all cases involving Trump now seem to, is going to hinge on whether this is a court that still follows the rule of law, or one of the seemingly growing number that follow the rule of demagoguery, shallow self-interest and corruption.

    • j4k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Someone put out a signal light on the sky. We need a Teddy T1000 Roosevelt badly, with a very very big stick.

      • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        SCOTUS ruling doesn’t apply here, they’re just commenting on the general trend of people not willing to sentence trump to anything, seemingly.

        • dudinax
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          SCOTUS now rules whatever they want. Lower courts are getting the message.

      • WatDabney@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Right, but at this point, I wouldn’t put it past a court to just dream up some other excuse for ruling as their bias/bribes dictate.