ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoJPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipwww.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square126fedilinkarrow-up1371arrow-down129cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1342arrow-down1external-linkJPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilipwww.youtube.comProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square126fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareTheRealKuni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months ago Compared to something like JPEG XL? It is hands down worse in virtually all metrics. Only thing I can think of is that PNG is inherently lossless. Whereas JPEG XL can be lossless or lossy.
minus-squareKairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·8 months agoIt has a higher bit depth at orders of magnitude less file size. Admittedly it has a smaller max dimension, though the max for PNG is (I believe) purely theoretical.
Only thing I can think of is that PNG is inherently lossless. Whereas JPEG XL can be lossless or lossy.
It has a higher bit depth at orders of magnitude less file size. Admittedly it has a smaller max dimension, though the max for PNG is (I believe) purely theoretical.