• nifty
    link
    fedilink
    191 month ago

    I like how the position axis starts at 0, maybe that’s for a year they don’t qualify

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    161 month ago

    If the article is about how just a few countries are dominating the podiums, I think this is an incredibly effective graph.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    111 month ago

    This reminds me of that chart showing gun deaths over a few years that showed the line going down the more deaths there were. That made sense graphically, they colored it in to look like blood dripping down, but this is just dumb.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    51 month ago

    The Y axis is the absolute number of medals and the labels for each data point are relative rankings. If one country got all the medals except one and Ireland got that one remaining medal, there would be a data point at Y=1 with the label “2nd”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    Tbh I don’t see where this is bad (except maybe the 0 label). Why should “up” always be “better”? There are countless other examples where this is not the case. Or am I missing something here?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      81 month ago

      It measures place, rather than performance (like medals got). It’s a line graph, when there’s no events between the data points, so it should be a bar graph. And yeah, up is better.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        51 month ago

        A bar chart for this kind of data makes no sense to me as the bar doesn’t really represent anything. A scatter plot is a good choice and adding a connection line for readability is imo not so bad. It should however be inverted going up to 1 and not down to 0.

      • ddh
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        Line chart is fine here as it’s the same measure over time.