I want a NAS solution to back up my PC and host media files, but prebuilt NAS solutions are incredibly expensive and underwhelming and so I’m planning to build one. Does anyone have recommendations for a NAS interface?

I’m brand new to server management and would prefer something user friendly. I have used linux mint, but currently use windows as my daily driver (planning to switch to mint soon). I’d be fine with a dedicated NAS OS or with something I could run on mint since I’m already familiar with that distro.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    181 month ago

    OpenMediaVault (OMV) is a Debian server with a very user-friendly web interface. It also has solid documentation and a robust community. I’ve been running it for 6 years, and I am very happy with it.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 month ago

      I would just use the CLI. The web interface is a bit confusing and doesn’t allow directory services.

  • Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    81 month ago

    Is it going to be just a NAS? If so go TrueNAS with lots of ram. (ZFS likes its ram)

    If you want to run VMs use Proxmox

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      31 month ago

      Honestly, I run my TrueNAS with obly 8GiB and it does great. That said, I’m not doing any deduplication or anything, and my pool is only 3 drives at a total of ~15TB iirc

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          Not for me. Runs fine with minimal if any latency. Transfer speeds are not blazing fast, but typically sit in the 50MB/s or so range over samba

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            Is that read or write? Also is sustained long term and if not how long does it take to run out of cache?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago
              1. Both
              2. I’ve done writes and reads that are in excess of a TB at a time. No real issues.

              I’m sure I’m missing a touch of performance here or there, but I can’t notice, so who cares. It means I don’t have to go spend money on new RAM when I’m too broke to even eat most days lol

        • @LeFantome
          link
          21 month ago

          Perhaps a safe bet but crazy . Anything over 8 GB will work and 16 gigs or more will work well. The more the better but don’t get the wrong idea from Mr. 128 GB.

        • @Giloron
          link
          11 month ago

          🤣 My TrueNAS server with 16GB servers files just fine.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            11 month ago

            It is needed as spinning rust is slow. It also depends on what you are using it for. 128gb is a safe bet but depending on your needs you could go lower.

  • Corgana
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    TrueNAS is fine but the dead-simplest I’ve ever seen is CasaOS which has one-click network file sharing.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    61 month ago

    As someone with TrueNAS SCALE and having been through the mess of TrueCharts, I’d go with Proxmox on the bare metal and have 1 VM for TrueNAS SCALE and another for docker-compose or whatever apps system you want. SCALE is fine as a NAS but the apps system is currently limited and about to completely change; it’s just not mature not stable. If you already have a home server running the apps you want and you’re only expecting this server to be a NAS, then go ahead with SCALE on bare metal.

    • jerb
      link
      fedilink
      English
      21 month ago

      Seconding this. TrueCharts has been an absolute pain and I would not wish it on my worst enemy.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        21 month ago

        Thirded. TrueCharts has been a monumental pita. Looking forward to docker compose in the fall with the next version of TrueNAS is released.

        • jerb
          link
          fedilink
          English
          21 month ago

          Wasn’t aware they were integrating docker-compose, that’s the perfect solution. I got so fed up with TrueCharts that I’ve been considering nuking my NAS and reinstalling OMV or something similar, but I guess I’ll wait it out and see what happens.

        • Carlos Francisco 🦣
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          @windlas @jerb @linux I started with truenas, but trying to install an app that is not in truecharts is a mess. Finally I moved to proxmox and I can install whatever I want in a container or VM. It’s really easy to learn how to use it. I totally recommend it.

    • @LeFantome
      link
      11 month ago

      I love Proxmox but I am too much of a coward to run my NAS as a VM. It just feels like it would blow up on me. I know it is a normal thing to do. It just scares me.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    41 month ago

    Unraid is as simple as they come and it has some features that don’t exist in normal RAID setups.

  • @Giloron
    link
    21 month ago

    HexOS is built on TrueNAS and looks promising as a simplified version. Looks like it isn’t available yet but I think you’re who the kind of user they are building it for.

    https://hexos.com/

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    I’d honestly just go Ubuntu server LTS and learn to configure it through the terminal. It’s not too difficult to setup. NFS and Samba shares.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    Synology and Qnap cheaper solutions would work just fine for what you need, and are only ~$200-300. Cheaper then building an entire box, but if not…

    Fract Node 804 Case (space for 8 3.5" HDDs, AMD lower wattage CPU, whatever mobo with an SFP module.

    Run TrueNAS or Unraid on it, and you’ll be ready to go.

    • ALoafOfBreadOP
      link
      fedilink
      21 month ago

      You might be right. The Synology products look really good. I didn’t see that they actually have a sub-$400 4-bay NAS… DS423. Not sure if it’ll meet my performance needs. But the $600 4 bay doesn’t look too bad either really.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        11 month ago

        Do you really need a 4 bay unit though? HDD are cheap right now. You can get a Synology DS-2XX for ~$200, and 2x14TB Refurb WDC for $200. That’s 14TB of Raid 1 protected storage right there for $400.

        • ALoafOfBreadOP
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I didn’t realize how cheap the big hdds had gotten. Definitely looking into 2 bays.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            21 month ago

            Yeah, definitely explore it. You can get more service-level things out of a build or higher disk array, but if you don’t need the compute, just go cheap and be satisfied your stuff is safe. Synology has a great ecosystem in my experience.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    21 month ago

    I started with TrueNAS and it works great. Either regular TrueNAS or TrueNAS scale will suit your needs well, the major difference being that Scale uses a Linux base instead of the FreeBSD of core