Okay, so we are having a public enquiry now?
From the article, it sounds like there were a number of allegations that Johnston didn’t investigate, so that makes sense.
Getting the opposition parties to agree on the head of the enquiry before it starts seems like a good idea.
The NDP is talking about increasing scope to include other states.
I’m pretty sure a foreign agent registry (of implemented properly) would cover any and all state actors.
Is it just me that cares about institutional influence and not just state influence? They’re equally dangerous given the power and political associations of many of these institutions.
Expanding the scope is a stall tactic that will ensure this thing is dragged out for the next 10+ years