Christian Dingus, 28, was with his partner when, he says, employees told the couple not to kiss inside, and the argument escalated outside.

A gay man accused a group of Washington, D.C., Shake Shack employees of beating him after he kissed his boyfriend inside the location while waiting for their order.

Christian Dingus, 28, was with his partner and a group of friends at a Dupont Circle location Saturday night when the incident occurred, he told NBC News. They had put in their order and were hanging around waiting for their food.

“And while we were back there — kind of briefly — we began to kiss,” Dingus said. “And at that point, a worker came out to us and said that, you know, you can’t be doing that here, can’t do that type of stuff here.”

The couple separated, Dingus said, but his partner got upset at the employee and insisted the men had done nothing wrong. Dingus’ partner was then allegedly escorted out of the restaurant, where a heated verbal argument occurred.

  • finley@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    But that doesn’t mean that they are being honest about the preamble to the altercation.

    YOU, again, are the only one implying this, without evidence. And you’re clearly doing it to excuse the bigotry and violence they faced.

      • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        24
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        I said I got a feeling from the way he phrased his story.

        “From the way you phrase your posts, I guess you might have disturbing images on your hard drive. I might be wrong.”

        Would you take offence if I said that? If yes, then think about what you’re doing.

          • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            I accused them of getting a little too into their makeout session.

            You also say that this does not warrant violence. So why even make that point?

            If one of my female friends is sexually harassed, and I say, “There’s no excuse for that. It doesn’t matter how you were dressed. However, I bet you were dressed provocatively,” am I being a despicable piece of shit?

            weirdo

            I accept I’m ‘weird’, because I’m heavily autistic. But at least I don’t come across like someone who says “Of course you’re not at fault, BUT…”

            Edit: checking your post history, you’ve never said anything interesting. Okay, bye.

            • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              22
              ·
              3 months ago

              If you female friend wore a shirt so low cut and loose that she was flashing her tits to everyone and was asked to leave the restaurant because of it, so she started arguing and then the employee attacked her… no, her clothing did not excuse the attack. It does excuse her being asked to leave. It is pretty simple how both of those things can be true. It is pretty simple that the fact that she was attacked doesn’t make the employee asking her to leave unjustified. And if she recounted the story and said “he had a problem with my shirt that might have been a little low cut”, and failed to mention she was fully flashing people, she would be lying about the facts even if those facts, again, don’t justify the violence that followed. I don’t know why this is so complicated. Reality has nuance.

              • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                3 months ago

                I said “If one of my female friends is sexually harassed,” and you turned that into being ‘asked to leave’.

                Two gay people were assaulted, and you turned that into a discussion about them being asked to leave.

                Pretty weird.

                • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  19
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  They weren’t even initially asked to leave. Read his account. They were asked to stop the PDA, then the partner started to argue and then was escorted out. That is the in the victim’s own account.

              • finley@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Wow, now you’re using offensive tropes about women to justify your endorsement of this homophobic attack?

                Can you go no lower?

                • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Really? Because I think it might be justifiable to ask a woman leave a restaurant if she is indecency exposed? Do you even know what an incel is? Pretty sure they would be on the opposite side of that argument.

              • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                11
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                3 months ago

                Weren’t you supposed to do something to yourself?

                This is the most pathetic question I’ve come across for some time, and I’m a teacher, and being asked pathetic questions is a daily occurrence for me.

                Nobody is talking to you.

                No, because we’re typing to each other.

                • kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  The guy was reply bombing me with the same accusation about 8 time an hour ago. Every time I responded to his comment, he’d repeat the same thing. Again, context matters, dude.

                  • EleventhHour@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    8
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    More lies to justify your behavior. You know everyone can see your comments.

                    You kept using a lie you made up in order to justify the attack, and I keep calling you out when you lie.

                    If you don’t like that, stop using lies to justify bad behavior.

      • finley@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        yet, oddly, you keep asserting - without evidence - that the victims are liars and the bigotry and violence they received was justified.

            • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              3 months ago

              KryptonianCodeMonkey’s top post:

              There is never a reason for either party to escalate a verbal disagreement to a physical one, but…

              They modify a ‘never’ with a comma and a ‘but’. So, not ‘never’, clearly.

              It’s odd that they’re working so hard to pretend they’re not saying what they’re actually, visibly, verifiably saying.

              Thanks to everyone who questioned this so capably.