• Meruten@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article mentioned tear gas canisters be equipped instead. I can’t wait for a delivery robot to be near my property, someone tries to mess with it and gets gassed, then I get to enjoy tear gas as well from my front porch.

      • nous
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        30
        ·
        1 year ago

        Or some kid walks past it, bumps it slightly and gets gassed in the face.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m assuming the canisters would only be released if the door is forced open. I highly doubt it’s going to activate a few slightly knock it I mean hell, those things drive into lamp posts on occasion.

          • nous
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            With the care and attention tech companies give to the safety of their devices, I can definitely see it spraying someone unintended. Probably even the person it was delivering to. Any company sensible enough to properly implement this likely will finder better less potentially dangerous solutions to the problem. This idea stinks of someone who gave it 5 minutes of thought and wants it implemented as quickly as possible.

    • Aceticon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      Surely area of effect weaponry would be better.

      The higher collateral impact just serves as an extra lesson to any wannabe thieves.