• SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    It wasn’t good when it came out, why would it be good now? I understand this is an unpopular opinion, but it always wasn’t good.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      3 months ago

      I loved the Crow, I thought it was awesome, but I was also a kid when I saw it. Nonetheless, differences of opinions are all good.

      That being said, I’m not sure it stands the test of time

      My friend loved the Crow 2 over the original and that blew my mind because I thought the sequel wasn’t great …

      • SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        I was a kid too. All my friends loved it. They all wanted to watch it over and over. I found nothing good about it. It always just felt cringe to me.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          If you were a kid when The Crow came out, you are too old to be using “cringe” as an adjective.

          Edit: ITT: people for whom saying “cringe” is very close to their heart

          • Diddlydee@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            I’m 45 and have used cringe as an adjective since before most people who do were alive. It’s not a new thing.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              I’m sorry, it was a careless comment and I should have known you would not appreciate it. If I wanted to complain about it I should have done it elsewhere.

      • keyez@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Wife and I accidentally watched the sequel a few months ago, she was surprised I had never heard of the crow and I kinda had difficulty finding it on streaming. Watched the sequel first because it had been 15 years since she’s seen it she thought that was it. Watching both close together I thought the sequel had a better overall story but production, budget and acting were all severely worse but enjoyed both.

    • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Anything specific? I can overlook a lot of cinematic and technical issues in a film if the script and talent are good.

      • SacredHeartAttack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        The script was boring, the plot was…boring. It was supposed to be like this fun, edgy thing and it wasn’t. They sold aesthetic, and for a time when that aesthetic was cool, this didn’t even come close to making it feel cool. I was a kid when this came out, and I saw it then and I didn’t enjoy it. I watched about half of it recently and I still found it boring and not entertaining.

        • jerkface@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Cut them some slack. Their star left the production in the middle of a shot!

        • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          That’s what I was actually afraid of, thanks. I’m not the most critical guy about films, but I cannot abide a weak script.