• DokPsy@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      80
      ·
      3 months ago

      I’m flipping between “why is there cuneiform Unicode” and “of course there’s cuneiform Unicode” much more rapidly than I really expected

      • Kerb@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        61
        ·
        3 months ago

        cuneiform isnt even that weird,
        check out the multiocular O ꙮ
        this was only used once in a single cyrillic manuscript to spell “many-eyed seraphim”

      • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        3 months ago

        𓂸 𓂹 𓂺 there are hieroglyphs too, and these appear often enough to be included.

        • emptyother
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Shame I can only see squares there. I wonder why. I can see wikipedia’s. Does this work? Two hieroglyphs: 𓂀𓀀

          Edit: It does, I can read those in my own comment.

          Edit 2: Windows issue? I can see them on Android/sync for lemmy.

          • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 months ago

            I can see both your and the original hieroglyphics just fine on my phone using Firefox, and on windows with the same.

            Odd thing is, my wife sometimes gets MY emoji and non-standard text as squares, and we have the exact same phone. The only difference between us is she uses the default keyboard.

      • IrritableOcelot@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, most dead scripts have Unicode, specifically because how the hell would you write academic papers about them in this day and age otherwise? Even old Irish Ogham:

        ᚅᚖᚙᚗ

        The line is a convention, because ogham was originally written on the corner of a stone stela.

        • Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          ᚛ᚑᚌᚆᚐᚋ ᚔᚄ ᚐᚃᚓᚄᚑᚋᚓ᚜

          Ogham is awesome

          I’ve used it for cryptic languages in TTRPGs before, alongside a few other runic scripts like ᛖᛚᛞᛖᚱ᛫ᚠᚢᚦ︍ᚨᚱᚲ.

          My favorite is Gallifreyan, which doesn’t have unicode, is far too niche and homebrewed to have unicode, and how the hell would unicode even work?

          Gallifreyan

      • reinei@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        For anyone else stumbling about this revelation: It very well wouldn’t be Unicode otherwise now, would it?

        There’s a reason linguists and computer scientists sometimes get mental breakdowns over emoji because the know that those same emoji were on the same agenda taking up actual time as discussions about which ancient language or newly discovered grapheme/symbol/lexicogram/whatever should be added first/next. (Not saying emoji aren’t also tremendously important/good/what ever additions!!)