• peopleproblems@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    207
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hahahahaha so it doesn’t break anything that still relies on cookies, but neuters the ability to share them.

    That’s awesome

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Honestly, I thought that’s how it already worked.

      Edit: I think what I’m remembering is that you can define the cookies by site/domain, and restrict to just those. And normally would, for security reasons.

      But some asshole sites like Facebook are cookies that are world-readable for tracking, and this breaks that.

      Someone correct me if I got it wrong.

      • ArchRecord@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        3 months ago

        Total Cookie Protection was already a feature, (introduced on Feb 23st 2021) but it was only for people using Firefox’s Enhanced Tracking Protection (ETP) on strict mode.

        They had a less powerful third-party cookie blocking feature for users that didn’t have ETP on strict mode, that blocked third party cookies on specific block lists. (i.e. known tracking companies)

        This just expanded that original functionality, by making it happen on any domain, and have it be the default for all users, rather than an opt-in feature of Enhanced Tracking Protection.

        • ripcord@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          That’s not what I was thinking of, which was even more fundamental. But that’s good info (and another way to cover stuff in the article).

          Edit: what I was thinking originally was really stupid, that 3rd-party cookies weren’t allowed at all. Which was really dumb since of course they are.

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        3 months ago

        They’ve been doing this with container tabs, so this must be the successor to that idea (I’m going to assume they’ll still have container tabs).

        • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          3 months ago

          Container tabs are still a thing in FF. This is based on that work, if I remember correctly.

            • Kushan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Same, they’re an absolute game changer for me. I have to use multiple different identities in work due to separate active directories and container tabs makes it super easy

        • snaggen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          Container tabs are still useful, as they let you use multiple Cookie jars for the same site. So, it is very easy to have multiple accounts on s site.

    • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Unless that cookie was somehow important for you to use both sites, but thats incredibly rare.

    • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      From my experience, blocking 3rd party cookies in general doesn’t seem to make any difference for site functionality anyways. Though I never log into sites with a Google or FB account other than Google or FB sites (and rarely at all for the latter).