The Canadian government on Friday demanded that Meta lift a “reckless” ban on domestic news from its platforms to allow people to share information about wildfires in the west of the country.

  • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like Canada should be working in effective ways to communicate with its citizens that doesn’t rely on Facebook

    • Tinister@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean it’s a tough situation. If users want to dive deep into their bubble and ignore everything else, you’d pretty much have to set up Amber Alert style phone alarms or something. How well would that go over?

      • earthling@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Those people need to pull their head out.

        It should be on the government to post this information on a public government website. It should be on the people to go read it.

        I do believe governments should be looking at alternative alerting options though. They should take the recent API rate hikes by Twitter as a bright red warning that they should never have relied on private companies like this for important alerts.

      • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        You could have just not punished them for allowing users to use the “share on Facebook” link the news sites put below every article?

        Fuck Facebook. They’re a disgusting excuse for a company that’s in the wrong on basically everything else they’ve ever done. But they aren’t even a shred of wrong on this.

  • earthling@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Meta started blocking news on its Facebook and Instagram platforms for all users in Canada this month in response to a new law requiring internet giants to pay for news articles.

    Look, I hate Facebook as much as the next guy but you have to admit, Canada doesn’t have much to bitch about. They did this to themselves.

    Facebook doesn’t want to pay for news articles so they decided not to have news at all. ¯\(ツ)

    • conciselyverbose@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      The entire premise of a link tax is batshit insane. It’s not mediocre. It’s not “I can see where they’re coming from”. It completely and irreparably breaks the internet.

      The previews are exactly what sites ask for them to show. You don’t get to tell them “please show this content” then accuse them of stealing content.

  • recursive_recursion [they/them]A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I was initially thinking that our government could just start up a Lemmy instance but then I remembered how awful our current software infrastructure is

    like it’s not the worst but definitely far from the best available

    I dunno, maybe it’s worth trying anyways as it could kickstart a recursive update on everything else🤔¯\_(ツ)_/¯

    • Spotlight7573@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shouldn’t they just need to make some kind of ActivityPub-based system (or just setup a government run Mastodon instance if they don’t want to work with their own software) for distributing their information and then just start publishing the alerts that way? I could see a real niche for a simple ActivityPub system for governments and businesses who just need to publish information and don’t need all the multiuser/conversation features.

      • Zima@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        From their delusional point of view it’s cheaper to demand fb solve the problem.