• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    For an ugly fucking lady like Rowling, you’d think she would understand that going down the path of “that woman isn’t feminine looking enough to really be a woman” is anti-feminist at it’s core and could hurt her in the long run when people begin questioning her gender for being an ugly ass.

    Or does she really think she’s some hot shit and not some ugly twat?

    It’s literally already happened to Kyle Rittenhouse and Andrew Tate. She’s making this worse for herself in the long run.

    • BCsven@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      ? I mean here personality is ugly, but google images make it seem like she is not physically ugly. Not that that really matters.

    • Mac@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      Perhaps you’ve been projecting the ugliness within you all along and that normal looking non-supermodels can be shitty people for things separate from the way they look.

    • Thassodar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      She may be making it worse but she has made enough money to not give a shit.