• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    This is kind of a garbage take. Revolution is just one puzzle piece in the large set of tools necessary to effect real change. Revolution can also happen in many different ways from silent to political to violent. And all of those can very much happen overnight if all the pieces are in the right place.

      • EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        3 months ago

        I think (I hope) by overnight revolution, they mean the tipping point from civil unrest into actual change. It took a decade of protesting for Civil Rights to get popular support, but the law was drafted, written, and signed in less than a week due to the destruction wrought across the country after MLK was assassinated.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        3 months ago

        Right? If China and Russia are anything to go by, I want none of that revolution. They still have garbage governance even today. I’m convinced a revolution would get us from shit to absolute vile hot diarrhea.
        I think I prefer trying to change the diet instead, just to stick to the metaphor.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          You say that cuz you’re comfortable. If you were a serf in Imperial Tsarist Russia you might have a different mindset.

          • socsa@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            This is the difference though. Many modern leftists insist that iterative harm reduction under capitalism is exactly the same level of oppression as being a feudal serf. That’s actually the core basis of their thesis - that any capitalism is literally violence against them and therefore justifies violence against others.

            Have there been just revolutions in the past? Of course. But overthrowing kings and dictators is quite a bit different than tearing down a society which has both injustice but also a high standard of living. It seems to imagine that only the injustice will be eliminated through violence, which is demonstrably untrue.

            • njm1314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Yeah the problem with your statement here is that we know for a fact that the only thing that stopped capitalism from making people literal serfs is political violence. We had to fight a second Civil War in this country. Literal battles. If it weren’t for those you’d be chained to a factory right now. That’s the way capitalism will always go. You shouldn’t be under misunderstanding that the current level of standard of living has anything to do with capitalism. The Golden Age of capitalism is the Gilded Age.

        • umbrella@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          you can say whatever you want but china and russia had unprecedented growth because of their respective revolutions.

          • YeetPics@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Russia added some territory in the last few years, but that was at the hand of authoritarian imperialism and NOT due to a revolution.

            Stop apologizing for crimes of fascists.