• Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    No it can’t be applied evenly. Cops have legal authority to use force, including lethal force. Name another group of people with that right.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Soldiers.

      But anyways, i think it’s just as reprehensible for, as an example, an engineer to not report his coworker cutting corners on an infrastructure project that could jeopardize an entire community (maybe he wanted to meet a deadline to make himself look good, maybe he took money under the table from an interested party) as for a cop to not report his coworker who took a bribe from a drug dealer. In both cases, the bystander has equal ability to intervene and potentially save lives. The fact that the police officer has the right to use force as part of their job description isn’t really relevant.

      • Masterbaexunn@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        What? No, according to international law and the Geneva Conventions, soldiers generally do not have the legal authority to kill a citizen unless that citizen is actively participating in hostilities during a declared war, meaning they are considered a combatant; killing a civilian who is not actively involved in combat would be considered a war crime

        • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          You didn’t say anything about civilians. And besides, police officers can only use lethal force in either self defense or to protect others. In fact, that’s the same standard for “lawful homicide” as literally anyone else.