“The complaint filed in San Diego Superior Court said that when people at Home Depot brought an item to checkout, they would be charged more money than was written on the shelf tag or on the item itself.”

  • flynnguy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    2 months ago

    One time I went to buy a power tool that was on sale at Home Depot. I did the self checkout and the sale did not ring up correctly. I got one of the employees attention and they just told me there was nothing they could do, whatever it rings up as is the price and they can’t change it. No amount of pointing at the massive sale sign would change that.

    So I put it back and bought it from an online site that was having the same sale. Fuck Home Depot… Since then I go out of my way to not shop there.

    • criticon@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I had the same issue a couple of times. I had to order it online for store pick up and just wait for an employee to fulfill the order

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      They totally can. I’ve watched them do it on their self checkouts.

      Everything can be overridden with a manager.

      That’s totally a won’t not can’t.

    • w3dd1e@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I used to work there. We were allowed up to $50 without approval from a manager. It’s one of the things I liked about working there. If the customer told me the price was incorrect, I’d just fix it. We didn’t fight over a couple dollars. It wasn’t worth it.

  • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 months ago

    While the company admitted no wrongdoing, it must pay $1.7 million in civil penalties, as well as $277,251 to cover investigation costs as well as to “support future enforcement of consumer protection laws.”

    Why is it we allow these companies to pretend they did no evil? The penalty should have been a couple orders of magnitude higher, and they should have had to admit what they did. Obviously we don’t live in a world where both those things would happen, but we don’t even get one of them?

    They surely made more than two million doing this and so the fine is meaningless. The real way to make it meaningful would be to force the admission of guilt, and then use the admission as justification to stop them from buying out the competition for 18 billion dollars.

    Look how they deceived their customers, good thing they can do it to even more customers now!