idk where to really put this (might turn into a blog post later or something). it’s what you might call a “hot take”, certainly a heterodox one to some parts of the broader #fediverse community. this is in response to recent discussion on “what do you want to see from AP/AS2 specs” (in context of wg rechartering) mostly devolving into people complaining about JSON-LD and extensibility, some even about namespacing in general (there was a suggestion to use UUID vocab terms. i’m not joking)

1/?

  • blaine@mastodon.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    @[email protected] lolsob. This is/was the whole point of webfinger (“It’s DNS, for people”) but the mastodon implementation kind of missed that part. But it’s trivially possible to do that.

    My ideal is to have one “personal address” [per life context, e.g., work, family, social, etc] that points to different stuff I’m sharing in different contexts, with tagging to indicate in which contexts it the various feeds/etc might be useful. e.g., a tech-focused mastodon feed, a pixelfed feed for family, etc.

    • blaine@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 months ago

      @trwnh … and *critically* for what I think you’re saying, there’s nothing preventing linking from a webfinger profile to e.g. a wiki or a webpage of any sort, or another identifier like a phone number or a signal account. Again, this is all stuff that informed the original design of webfinger, over 15 years ago now 🙈

      • infinite love ⴳ@mastodon.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 months ago

        @blaine yup, more or less. the only difference i’d make is that instead of having multiple feeds for mastodon/pixelfed/etc i’d rather it was all done via the same identity

        one of the things that i wish were implemented broadly is support for streams – arbitrary collections that you could post into and other people could follow. to my knowledge no one other than google+ has done it. and, well… we know how google+ went…

        • blaine@mastodon.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          @[email protected] oh, totally. To be clear, the way I imagine it is that to end users, it all looks like a single identity, and which feed/stream is negotiated based on the context you’re using the identity. So, e.g., my main public profile might be “[email protected]”, and if someone tried to follow me on mastodon, they’d get my “short text notes” stream, and if someone else tried to follow me from pixelfed they’d get my “square format insta-like-social photos” stream.