idk where to really put this (might turn into a blog post later or something). it’s what you might call a “hot take”, certainly a heterodox one to some parts of the broader #fediverse community. this is in response to recent discussion on “what do you want to see from AP/AS2 specs” (in context of wg rechartering) mostly devolving into people complaining about JSON-LD and extensibility, some even about namespacing in general (there was a suggestion to use UUID vocab terms. i’m not joking)

1/?

    • blaine@mastodon.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      @[email protected] @[email protected] since tel: is extremely fraught, especially nowadays with insane phone spam etc, a Signal/WhatsApp/etc address might be a good alternative example?

      I particularly like the “established encrypted messenger” example because the wf->[rel=messenger]-> lookup could get Fedi encrypted DMs “for free.”

      (obviously lots I’m glossing over that make it more complicated, but in theory it’d be less complicated than many alternatives)

      • blaine@mastodon.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        @[email protected] @[email protected] (one thing to note is that it’s not possible to declare an alias, e.g. a phone number in a wf or other profile, and then use that alias in reverse as a way to look up the original profile. I mean, one could do it, but with questions of identity at play it would be an incredibly very extremely bad idea to do that from every conceivable security perspective.)