The article is actually decently well written good-faith satire meant to address how poverty and hunger are inherent to capitalism as a system. The title was just too bold lol

      • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
        22·
        2 个月前

        Y’all should actually read the article because it seems like it’s saying something completely different from what OP is trying to make it sound like. Basically, if I understood correctly, Kent was being critical of the idea that market-led solutions (i.e. capitalism fixes hunger) are better than community-driven solutions. He was also saying that hunger is part of capitalism, and you’ll never get rid of hunger while capitalism exists, because capitalism needs to withhold resources to force people to work.

        This paragraph seems to sum up the article pretty well:

        In Kent’s view, one gathers, global hunger is not a complex problem that is being addressed by free market capitalism; it’s a moral one that requires empowering intellectuals like Kent to solve it.

        • skittle07crusher@sh.itjust.works
          5·
          2 个月前

          And to be clear you mean the original UN article, not the article from the libertarian think tank “Foundation for Economic Education” (“FEE”)

          And the UN article link (archive) is in the comments

          • Mossy Feathers (She/They)@pawb.social
            3·
            2 个月前

            I couldn’t find the original UN article which is why I was referencing the FEE one. Also, while I quoted the bit about “empowered intellectuals” I assumed that was pro-capitalist cynicism towards education and community due to the heavily pro-capitalist slant in the rest of the FEE article. I kinda figured everyone else picked up on that too.

            Thanks for the link! I’ll have to read the original in a bit.

            • ShareMySims@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              3·
              2 个月前

              the original UN article

              Someone linked it bellow: https://archive.is/MObDZ

              The FEE article is garbage, but the original is like a broken clock, it makes a couple of valid points, but it doesn’t strike me as being written by an anti capitalist, but by someone who wants to reform capitalism.