• Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 months ago

    The alternative is to use extremely limited quantities of gas crucial for MRIs, chip making, metallurgy, and a few other high tech applications. But hey, pretty balloons.

      • RedEye FlightControl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Only a matter of time before they can’t get any because we wasted such a limited resource on vanity instead of the pursuit of science.

        • el_abuelo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 months ago

          Perspective my dude. An insignificant small amount is spent on vanity.

          I’ve used more helium on a single dive than I’ve ever used in balloons in my entire life.

            • el_abuelo
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              At a stretch perhaps, but it’s more recreational - I liken it to going to visit a castle, or going on a safari…just underwater!

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      When I was a kid, Dave Berry had a column where he made fun of the US Strategic Helium Reserve. This taught me an important lesson: when people make fun of what seems like government waste, 75% of the time it turns out to be really important. Not always, but you should look into it more.

      • Aqarius@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yeah, there’s areas where it’s surprisingly hard for laypeople to tell apart “mostly useless” and “saves lives on a daily basis”.