renzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoI have the weirdest aesthetic preferenceslemmy.worldimagemessage-square99fedilinkarrow-up1788arrow-down129
arrow-up1759arrow-down1imageI have the weirdest aesthetic preferenceslemmy.worldrenzev@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square99fedilink
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·edit-23 months agoQR codes have built in redundancy and error correction, though. I guess if they had it turned up to the max for some reason?
minus-squareWaxedWookie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months agoYeah - that’d be my guess for an over-complicated code with minimal info.
minus-squareNoxy@yiffit.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoyeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason
minus-squaredan@upvote.aulinkfedilinkarrow-up1·3 months ago or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason Ideally you should use a short URL that redirects to the full URL. The tracking parameters should be on the long URL, not the short one.
QR codes have built in redundancy and error correction, though. I guess if they had it turned up to the max for some reason?
Yeah - that’d be my guess for an over-complicated code with minimal info.
yeah, qr codes have different levels of error correction that you can specify, could very be well turned up to the max
or the url has a ton of tracking params appended to it for some reason
Ideally you should use a short URL that redirects to the full URL. The tracking parameters should be on the long URL, not the short one.