• PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Calling atheism a belief is like calling bald a hair color. Or like saying ‘not collecting stamps’ is a hobby

      • bastion@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        You don’t have to call it belief if that makes you uncomfortable.

        It’s a world view. And, like other world views, it has normal, functional people who buy into it, and nutty fanatics who buy into it. It has people who use power wisely, and people who use power dangerously, at the expense of others.

        The concerning thing is that some people who hold atheism as a world view think this makes them immune to the dysfunctions of collective action, but that’s far from true. But, of course, it’s common to pick flaws in other world views and think your own shit doesn’t stink.

        • PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          29 days ago

          I think you may be conflating things a bit. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in gods, it doesn’t automatically come with a particular worldview. Worldviews are much more broad, as the name would imply. They encompass a set of values and assumptions about life. Atheism doesn’t prescribe how someone views politics, morality, or society. Those are shaped by other philosophies like humanism or existentialism.

          I agree that no one is immune to the dysfunctions of collective action, and atheists can certainly fall prey to the same human errors and biases that affect any group. However, attributing those flaws to atheism itself misses the point. The fact that individuals with different beliefs, whether religious or non-religious, have varying behaviors doesn’t stem from atheism as a ‘worldview’—it’s part of the complex nature of human society.

          Criticism of specific worldviews is valid, but atheism as a simple lack of belief in gods doesn’t operate on the same level as belief systems that come with doctrines and tenets.

      • Optional@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        29 days ago

        All gods are myths

        All religions are lies

        All faith - including that in the above two things - is delusion.

        I mean, you’re shooting your own messenger, but I hear ya.

        • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          28 days ago

          “What drink would you like?”

          “I’ll take a nice tall glass of the absence of water please.”

          “You mean that you don’t want a drink?”

          “No, the drink I’m requesting and the one I intend to drink the absence of water. Its my favourite drink.”

          "So, like a coke or something.’

          "No, thats the presence of coke. I want to drink the absence of water…

          What do you mean by ‘I’m being ridiculous’?"

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      It is a position you hold until a belief system provides sufficient evidence for you to form and hold a belief.

      Gnostic atheism is a specific form which nobody actually holds to, which says that there positively is no god and this is known to be a fact. Any reasonable person would admit you can’t know this. And so virtually all atheists are agnostic atheists.

      Being an agnostic atheist does not mean you are “on the fence” or “undecided” or “accepting of all beliefs equally.” It means you are intellectually honest that you cannot prove the non-existence of a god any more than you can prove there isn’t a planet in the universe where it rains lemonade. But until you have a firm reason to believe that some god exists, you’re going to proceed as if they don’t, because that’s the conclusion, however perpetually provisional, that best matches the evidence.