The rules were ALSO that you were not going to lie…
They lied about that rule.
No, just no.
So I didn’t see this, yet, but please tell me that this image doesn’t contain a verbatim quote of how this went down. This would be insanity
“Th-the rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check me, and since you’re fact-checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going on,” Vance said.”
Unfortunately it’s true.
See for yourself
That’s when I turned it off.
When they complain about being fact checked and that not fact checking them was a prerequisite for them to attend the debate, that tells you everything about what they stand for.
Fascists are easily startled but they’ll soon be back. And in greater numbers.
Lol I’m loving all the star wars references tonight.
The idea that these putzes whine about being fact-checked. This is where we are at.
And this from the bunch that wear shirts that say things like “fuck your feelings” and “facts don’t care about your feelings”. Then they melt the very second a fact shows up to negate their feelings about their fictions.
Actually amazing. How is this the timeline we’re in
“You told me I could tell lies unchecked!”
Snowflake
And this melting snowflake may actually be our next vice president.
I like my VPs able to take criticism
Given Donny’s general health, this melting snowflake may well be your next president
Looks like the source changed the headline on you:
“J.D. Vance Lashes Out After the Smallest Fact-Check in V.P. Debate”
If you could update yours, that would be great!
It has been updated now
What was it originally?
J.D. Vance Freaks Out Over the Slightest Pushback in V.P. Debate
kind of expected since hes a orangian snd part of that cowards troop
It’s because (like all authoritarian dildos) he has an ego larger than he deserves and can’t look inward for anything.
Ignorant, lying, coward. Also the way his body shape is leaning: cow-ward
trump stance, maybe he’s wearing trump lifts?
I think the reports of Vance having “won” are greatly overstated:
42% vs. 41%? That’s well within the margin of error, LOL.
What are your numbers supposed to mean? From your article:
Prior to the debate, a New York Times/Siena College poll released Sept. 28 found Midwestern voters prefer Walz to Vance: Walz was viewed favorably by 44% of voters and unfavorably by 41%, while Vance was viewed favorably by 42% of voters and unfavorably by 48%.
So 44% like Walz, 42% like Vance. 41% dislike Walz, 48% dislike Vance. Comparing 42 and 41 is comparing two different things
42%. That’s how many debate viewers in the CBS poll thought Vance was the winner of the debate, compared to 41% who thought Walz won. Seventeen percent of viewers said the debate ended in a tie.
A candidate being mad at a fact check is a massive red flag
deleted by creator
