silence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-25 months agoBritain Backs Plan to Store Carbon Dioxide Under the Sea | Two proposals in Northern England, led by the energy giants BP and Eni, aim to establish an industry in burying emissionswww.nytimes.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up120arrow-down10file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkBritain Backs Plan to Store Carbon Dioxide Under the Sea | Two proposals in Northern England, led by the energy giants BP and Eni, aim to establish an industry in burying emissionswww.nytimes.comsilence7@slrpnk.netM to Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.@slrpnk.netEnglish · edit-25 months agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
This appears to be aimed at subsidizing the construction of a gas-burning power plant, rather than achieving a reduction in net CO2 emissions
minus-squaresilence7@slrpnk.netOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoYeah, adding the CCS makes the whole thing as expensive as nuclear.
minus-square[email protected]@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·edit-25 months agoExcept nuclear already exists and actually works
minus-squareTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·5 months agoWait til you hear about how CCS does less than reducing actual emissions. 1 unit stored is not the same benefit as 1 unit prevented.
Yeah, adding the CCS makes the whole thing as expensive as nuclear.
Except nuclear already exists and actually works
Wait til you hear about how CCS does less than reducing actual emissions. 1 unit stored is not the same benefit as 1 unit prevented.