Five@slrpnk.net to Buy it for Life@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 months agoThe Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Productwww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square72fedilinkarrow-up127arrow-down17
arrow-up120arrow-down1external-linkThe Instant Pot Failed Because It Was a Good Productwww.theatlantic.comFive@slrpnk.net to Buy it for Life@slrpnk.netEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square72fedilink
minus-squaredelirious_owl@discuss.onlinelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 months agoHow is it a failure to make a product that a bunch of people love? Stop projecting
minus-squareUmbrias@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 months agoperhaps you could read the article, but the jist is that in this economic system the good product was so good that people bought it and then sales dried as nobody needed another, rendernng the company bankrupt.
minus-squarepigup@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0arrow-down1·3 months agoI, for one, did not love it. Horrible UI. Difficult to clean. Hot plastics steaming plasticizers into the air and food. 👎
minus-squareactivistPnk@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoI don’t get how plastics can reach the food. Didn’t yours have a stainless steel innerpot with a metal cover on the food side?
How is it a failure to make a product that a bunch of people love? Stop projecting
perhaps you could read the article, but the jist is that in this economic system the good product was so good that people bought it and then sales dried as nobody needed another, rendernng the company bankrupt.
I, for one, did not love it. Horrible UI. Difficult to clean. Hot plastics steaming plasticizers into the air and food. 👎
I don’t get how plastics can reach the food. Didn’t yours have a stainless steel innerpot with a metal cover on the food side?